Posted by: MandyS | June 27, 2013

Oversold and underused?

Block 3, Week 17, Activity 4: Cuban (2001)

1. What access to technology did the students and professors have at Stanford?

A vast array of technology.  I think the key point that Cuban makes is the fact that teachers are not averse to using technology, just that they use it very little in their teaching. This might not have anything to do with their own competence; it may simply be because they don’t see the pedagogical value? Likewise students are not averse to using technology to support their studies but again, they perhaps don’t see the value of using technology in the delivery of the materials.

2. What kinds of teaching does Cuban describe?

Lectures, small groups (tutorials?), case studies, role-playing, and debates.

3. Do you believe this kind of teaching is reflective of teaching in university today (either in general or related to your own experience)?

Very much so; variety is the key and they are all effective in their own ways so I doubt little has changed in methods of presentation over the last 15 – 20 years.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

lawyerineducation

Putting the MAODE into practice

Public Law for Everyone

Professor Mark Elliott

Paul Maharg

legal education :: technology :: rhetoric :: legal theory

The Ed Techie

My Journey through MAODE

Legal Verdict

Legal Commentary from The Open University Law School

%d bloggers like this: